<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Philip Pullman speaks against UK&#8217;s vetting laws</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sfwa.org/2009/08/philip-pullman-speaks-against-uks-vetting-laws/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sfwa.org/2009/08/philip-pullman-speaks-against-uks-vetting-laws/</link>
	<description>Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 06:32:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Boyo</title>
		<link>http://www.sfwa.org/2009/08/philip-pullman-speaks-against-uks-vetting-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator>Boyo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 00:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfwa.org/?p=2273#comment-315</guid>
		<description>The vetting laws do not apply to occasional guests and visitors to schools or any other place which has vulnerable people. As Pullman et al would be visitors - like visiting fire and police personnel to give talks,  and not workers or employees it is a hypothetical argument and a non-issue. Only if Pullman were to work in a school doing, for example, a week-long workshop, would it even be considered to vet him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The vetting laws do not apply to occasional guests and visitors to schools or any other place which has vulnerable people. As Pullman et al would be visitors &#8211; like visiting fire and police personnel to give talks,  and not workers or employees it is a hypothetical argument and a non-issue. Only if Pullman were to work in a school doing, for example, a week-long workshop, would it even be considered to vet him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonquil</title>
		<link>http://www.sfwa.org/2009/08/philip-pullman-speaks-against-uks-vetting-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonquil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 16:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfwa.org/?p=2273#comment-291</guid>
		<description>There is an important context for this.  The distinguished and award-winning children&#039;s book &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Mayne&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;William Mayne&lt;/a&gt; &quot;was imprisoned for two and a half years in 2004 after admitting to charges of child sexual abuse between 1960 and 1975, and was placed on the British sex offenders&#039; register for life.&quot;

It is not uncommon for people who are sexually attracted to children to take up professions where they have access to children.   The screening in response to this is not so much &quot;hysteria&quot; as it is reacting to a real problem.

Note that &quot;only present for one day&quot; overlooks the practice of grooming.  Nobody is suggesting that putative-molestor is going to molest the child at the school during the reading.  They are suggesting that when an adult is formally introduced to a child under the auspices of the school, thus giving the relationship official sanction, it is good to be reasonably sure that the adult doesn&#039;t have an ulterior motive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is an important context for this.  The distinguished and award-winning children&#8217;s book <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Mayne" rel="nofollow">William Mayne</a> &#8220;was imprisoned for two and a half years in 2004 after admitting to charges of child sexual abuse between 1960 and 1975, and was placed on the British sex offenders&#8217; register for life.&#8221;</p>
<p>It is not uncommon for people who are sexually attracted to children to take up professions where they have access to children.   The screening in response to this is not so much &#8220;hysteria&#8221; as it is reacting to a real problem.</p>
<p>Note that &#8220;only present for one day&#8221; overlooks the practice of grooming.  Nobody is suggesting that putative-molestor is going to molest the child at the school during the reading.  They are suggesting that when an adult is formally introduced to a child under the auspices of the school, thus giving the relationship official sanction, it is good to be reasonably sure that the adult doesn&#8217;t have an ulterior motive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip Pullman protests UK school vetting laws</title>
		<link>http://www.sfwa.org/2009/08/philip-pullman-speaks-against-uks-vetting-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip Pullman protests UK school vetting laws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 13:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfwa.org/?p=2273#comment-284</guid>
		<description>[...] (via SFWA)   Comments [0]Digg it!Facebook [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (via SFWA)   Comments [0]Digg it!Facebook [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
