<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Kill Your Imaginary Friends: When Your Audience Might Know More Than You Do</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sfwa.org/2010/02/how-to-kill-your-imaginary-friends-when-your-audience-might-know-more-than-you-do/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sfwa.org/2010/02/how-to-kill-your-imaginary-friends-when-your-audience-might-know-more-than-you-do/</link>
	<description>Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 20:02:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: F. Gwynplaine MacIntyre</title>
		<link>http://www.sfwa.org/2010/02/how-to-kill-your-imaginary-friends-when-your-audience-might-know-more-than-you-do/#comment-4195</link>
		<dc:creator>F. Gwynplaine MacIntyre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfwa.org/?p=7633#comment-4195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in the early 1980s, one of the scriptwriters for &quot;Superman&quot; comics decided to inject some realism into that comic book with a story line in which Superman&#039;s friend, newspaper editor Perry White, was diagnosed with Alzheimer&#039;s disease.

When &quot;Superman&quot; editor-in-chief Julie Schwartz saw this, he ruled that the writers would be forbidden to resolve this story line with some science-fictional or magical cure for Alzheimer&#039;s. Schwartz reasoned that some &quot;Superman&quot; readers have a relative with Alzheimer&#039;s, and it would be cruel and disrespectful to those readers if a fictional character had recourse to a cure that isn&#039;t available in the real world. Schwartz ruled that Perry White&#039;s Alzheimer&#039;s would remain a permanent plot point unless a real-world cure became available.

Of course, no cure was forthcoming. Eventually the writers just &quot;forgot&quot; about Perry White&#039;s problem, and his Alzheimer&#039;s went away by itself.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in the early 1980s, one of the scriptwriters for &#8220;Superman&#8221; comics decided to inject some realism into that comic book with a story line in which Superman&#8217;s friend, newspaper editor Perry White, was diagnosed with Alzheimer&#8217;s disease.</p>
<p>When &#8220;Superman&#8221; editor-in-chief Julie Schwartz saw this, he ruled that the writers would be forbidden to resolve this story line with some science-fictional or magical cure for Alzheimer&#8217;s. Schwartz reasoned that some &#8220;Superman&#8221; readers have a relative with Alzheimer&#8217;s, and it would be cruel and disrespectful to those readers if a fictional character had recourse to a cure that isn&#8217;t available in the real world. Schwartz ruled that Perry White&#8217;s Alzheimer&#8217;s would remain a permanent plot point unless a real-world cure became available.</p>
<p>Of course, no cure was forthcoming. Eventually the writers just &#8220;forgot&#8221; about Perry White&#8217;s problem, and his Alzheimer&#8217;s went away by itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.sfwa.org/2010/02/how-to-kill-your-imaginary-friends-when-your-audience-might-know-more-than-you-do/#comment-4106</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 01:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfwa.org/?p=7633#comment-4106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Avoiding specificity may be wise even if you do get it right.  Since patients vary, your completely correct description may seem wrong to someone not familiar with the possibility.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Avoiding specificity may be wise even if you do get it right.  Since patients vary, your completely correct description may seem wrong to someone not familiar with the possibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
