<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guest post&#8211;Science Fiction and the Post-Cold War</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sfwa.org/2010/08/guest-post-science-fiction-and-the-post-cold-war/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sfwa.org/2010/08/guest-post-science-fiction-and-the-post-cold-war/</link>
	<description>Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:46:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nader Elhefnawy</title>
		<link>http://www.sfwa.org/2010/08/guest-post-science-fiction-and-the-post-cold-war/#comment-11980</link>
		<dc:creator>Nader Elhefnawy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 13:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfwa.org/?p=9717#comment-11980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Ms. Reader. Thanks for writing.
I&#039;ve thought quite a bit about that issue as well, and if you&#039;re interested, I put some of those thoughts (which discuss factors from the state of theoretical science to changes in the publishing industry) into another article over at The Fix a couple of years ago, &quot;&#039;The End of Science Fiction&#039;: A View of the Debate.&quot;

Part 1 is here
http://ttapress.com/fix/features/end-of-science-fiction-p1/

Part 2 here
http://ttapress.com/fix/features/end-of-science-fiction-p2/

and the Postscript here
http://ttapress.com/fix/features/end-of-science-fiction-postscript/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ms. Reader. Thanks for writing.<br />
I&#8217;ve thought quite a bit about that issue as well, and if you&#8217;re interested, I put some of those thoughts (which discuss factors from the state of theoretical science to changes in the publishing industry) into another article over at The Fix a couple of years ago, &#8220;&#8216;The End of Science Fiction&#8217;: A View of the Debate.&#8221;</p>
<p>Part 1 is here<br />
<a href="http://ttapress.com/fix/features/end-of-science-fiction-p1/" rel="nofollow">http://ttapress.com/fix/features/end-of-science-fiction-p1/</a></p>
<p>Part 2 here<br />
<a href="http://ttapress.com/fix/features/end-of-science-fiction-p2/" rel="nofollow">http://ttapress.com/fix/features/end-of-science-fiction-p2/</a></p>
<p>and the Postscript here<br />
<a href="http://ttapress.com/fix/features/end-of-science-fiction-postscript/" rel="nofollow">http://ttapress.com/fix/features/end-of-science-fiction-postscript/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara Reader</title>
		<link>http://www.sfwa.org/2010/08/guest-post-science-fiction-and-the-post-cold-war/#comment-11921</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara Reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfwa.org/?p=9717#comment-11921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi.  I just found this website and read your wonderful essay.  I have been trying to find out what happened to what I like to call&#039;real&#039; science fiction, that is, fiction about the future of science.  Your comments are about the future of politics, but at least it discusses the serious side of this type of fiction.  While I loved comic books as a child, their elevation to near-serious status has left me sad.  I am also saddened by the lack of what I consider serious writing (or at least successful writing) of the type I grew up with, Clark, Asimov, Bradbury, etc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi.  I just found this website and read your wonderful essay.  I have been trying to find out what happened to what I like to call&#8217;real&#8217; science fiction, that is, fiction about the future of science.  Your comments are about the future of politics, but at least it discusses the serious side of this type of fiction.  While I loved comic books as a child, their elevation to near-serious status has left me sad.  I am also saddened by the lack of what I consider serious writing (or at least successful writing) of the type I grew up with, Clark, Asimov, Bradbury, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SF Signal: SF Tidbits for 8/18/10</title>
		<link>http://www.sfwa.org/2010/08/guest-post-science-fiction-and-the-post-cold-war/#comment-11816</link>
		<dc:creator>SF Signal: SF Tidbits for 8/18/10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 06:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfwa.org/?p=9717#comment-11816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Kowal (Shades of Milk and Honey).ArticlesLisa Goldstein on Malice vs. Stupidity.Nader Elhefnawy on Science Fiction and the Post-Cold War.Ted Gioia on Ray Bradbury at Ninety: An Appreciation.Marjorie M. Liu on Human Magic.Ethan Gilsdorf [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kowal (Shades of Milk and Honey).ArticlesLisa Goldstein on Malice vs. Stupidity.Nader Elhefnawy on Science Fiction and the Post-Cold War.Ted Gioia on Ray Bradbury at Ninety: An Appreciation.Marjorie M. Liu on Human Magic.Ethan Gilsdorf [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
