<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ebooks Outsell Print! Putting Headlines in Context</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sfwa.org/2012/08/ebooks-outsell-print-putting-headlines-in-context/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sfwa.org/2012/08/ebooks-outsell-print-putting-headlines-in-context/</link>
	<description>Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 23:41:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken M</title>
		<link>http://www.sfwa.org/2012/08/ebooks-outsell-print-putting-headlines-in-context/#comment-133576</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 17:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfwa.org/?guid=39b6bba5f7c4656388c4b3b991f64178#comment-133576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People like to own and share what they buy - I hear this regularly when the discussion of ebooks arises.  And the arbitrary erase of ereader material is a factor buyers consider.  Note that those who purchase a majority of titles in eformat have backed away some.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People like to own and share what they buy &#8211; I hear this regularly when the discussion of ebooks arises.  And the arbitrary erase of ereader material is a factor buyers consider.  Note that those who purchase a majority of titles in eformat have backed away some.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy Stewart</title>
		<link>http://www.sfwa.org/2012/08/ebooks-outsell-print-putting-headlines-in-context/#comment-133568</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 02:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfwa.org/?guid=39b6bba5f7c4656388c4b3b991f64178#comment-133568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While the data are interesting and I have no doubt that ebooks will overtake paper books HERE, if it were ever considered, the data would most likely show that WORLD distribution of ereaders and paper books is skewed toward technological peak cultures and doesn&#039;t consider that people in countries other than TPCs read also. No ereader in any format is readily available outside of typically technophillic cities -- nor do the units we possess have a battery that only has to be charged once every 10,000 hours of use or could withstand drought conditions, being laid on the pounded dirt floor of a hut, dropped into an ocean over the edge of an outrigger canoe or survive the monsoon season in Indonesia. A technocentric literacy view of the readers of Earth is starting to bother me!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the data are interesting and I have no doubt that ebooks will overtake paper books HERE, if it were ever considered, the data would most likely show that WORLD distribution of ereaders and paper books is skewed toward technological peak cultures and doesn&#8217;t consider that people in countries other than TPCs read also. No ereader in any format is readily available outside of typically technophillic cities &#8212; nor do the units we possess have a battery that only has to be charged once every 10,000 hours of use or could withstand drought conditions, being laid on the pounded dirt floor of a hut, dropped into an ocean over the edge of an outrigger canoe or survive the monsoon season in Indonesia. A technocentric literacy view of the readers of Earth is starting to bother me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Great Geek Manual &#187; Geek Media Round-Up: August 10, 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.sfwa.org/2012/08/ebooks-outsell-print-putting-headlines-in-context/#comment-133552</link>
		<dc:creator>The Great Geek Manual &#187; Geek Media Round-Up: August 10, 2012</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfwa.org/?guid=39b6bba5f7c4656388c4b3b991f64178#comment-133552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Ebooks Outsell Print! Putting Headlines in Context [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ebooks Outsell Print! Putting Headlines in Context [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Burt</title>
		<link>http://www.sfwa.org/2012/08/ebooks-outsell-print-putting-headlines-in-context/#comment-133529</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Burt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 14:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfwa.org/?guid=39b6bba5f7c4656388c4b3b991f64178#comment-133529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My crystal ball continues to suggest that ebooks will largely replace print by 2025 (if not well before; as I&#039;ve said since the early 2000s, even back when ebooks where 0.1% of sales and many folks said nawww, they&#039;ll never catch on at all). The reasoning, and the mathematical curve-fitting analysis of the adoption rate S-curve, remain the same.

Print will probably continue as a niche, says my magic 8-ball, and won&#039;t vanish entirely (even though new releases on VHS tape and 33rpm LPs largely have).

But the factors working against print aren&#039;t in its favor: The cost of materials (paper isn&#039;t getting cheaper), the cost of shipping (fuel isn&#039;t getting cheaper), the dent that the returns system puts into print but not electronic editions(plus the unpredictability of it, which doens&#039;t play well with financially risk-averse, bottom-line oriented publishers, i.e., all the major ones), the improvement of technology (e-reader technology, e-ink, e-paper, etc. will only get better, to there point where one might envision a codex bound volume of 300 paper-thin sheets of e-paper), network access will only get better worldwide (so one can grab a book any time), the ability to take more risks on content with ebooks because of the lower production costs, the &quot;getting comfortable with change&quot; factor that allows more people to accept a new thing is only in favor of ebooks, surveys show that very few people actively dislike e-readers once they&#039;ve tried them, and so on.

I can&#039;t offhand think of any tailwinds that are working in favor of print, just tailwinds for ebooks and headwinds for print.

Just because today ebooks are roughly the same order of magnitude as print sales is no indication we&#039;ve reached any kind of steady state. (Remember than when ebooks were 0.1% of sales many pundits said -that- was the steady state.) The product adoption &quot;S-curve&quot; is the thing to watch. When it starts to really flatten out (i.e. year-over-year ebook sales are flat), -then- we&#039;ll know we&#039;ve found equilibrium. However, year-over-year ebook sales are still growing at a huge rate. The growth rate will have to start slowing down a lot before it can plateau, and we don&#039;t even see it slowing down much yet. That suggests we&#039;re still in the early-middle to maybe middlish part of the S-curve. The left half the S-curve is more or less a mirror of the right half, so we can surmise that ebooks still have a lot of market share to gain still ahead of them, and will gain it within a few years. Based on the S-curve and my own curve-fitting to it, I would not be surprised to see the end result being that print captures 10% or less of sales.

It&#039;s worth pointing out that the AAP&#039;s data for ebook sales vs. print paint a generally similar picture (the AAP reported in June that YTD ebook sales surpassed hardcover sales; and are basically even with paperback sales - $282M ebook, $230M hardcover, $300M paperback, $99M mmbp; FYI, it&#039;s their data I base my analyses on), so it&#039;s not just specific to Amazon, even though Amazon sees the harbingers first. So, right, ebooks have not yet overtaken all print formats, but one train is accelerating rapidly and the other train is slowing down, so if the trends continue (and there&#039;s no apparent reason they shouldn&#039;t), ebooks will overtake all print sales fairly soon, and continue pulling ahead.

Some folks may not -like- what the data show the trend is and may wish it otherwise, but from the standpoint of the cold equations, it will be what it will be. Authors would be wise to plan for the (strong) possibility that ebooks will be the primary form of books within a few years.

(And thus, for example, look to get the best deal one can on electronic rights, and examine offers from publishers not in light of today&#039;s ebook sales figures, but also, e.g., in light of a scenario where ebook sales might be 90%+ of sales.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My crystal ball continues to suggest that ebooks will largely replace print by 2025 (if not well before; as I&#8217;ve said since the early 2000s, even back when ebooks where 0.1% of sales and many folks said nawww, they&#8217;ll never catch on at all). The reasoning, and the mathematical curve-fitting analysis of the adoption rate S-curve, remain the same.</p>
<p>Print will probably continue as a niche, says my magic 8-ball, and won&#8217;t vanish entirely (even though new releases on VHS tape and 33rpm LPs largely have).</p>
<p>But the factors working against print aren&#8217;t in its favor: The cost of materials (paper isn&#8217;t getting cheaper), the cost of shipping (fuel isn&#8217;t getting cheaper), the dent that the returns system puts into print but not electronic editions(plus the unpredictability of it, which doens&#8217;t play well with financially risk-averse, bottom-line oriented publishers, i.e., all the major ones), the improvement of technology (e-reader technology, e-ink, e-paper, etc. will only get better, to there point where one might envision a codex bound volume of 300 paper-thin sheets of e-paper), network access will only get better worldwide (so one can grab a book any time), the ability to take more risks on content with ebooks because of the lower production costs, the &#8220;getting comfortable with change&#8221; factor that allows more people to accept a new thing is only in favor of ebooks, surveys show that very few people actively dislike e-readers once they&#8217;ve tried them, and so on.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t offhand think of any tailwinds that are working in favor of print, just tailwinds for ebooks and headwinds for print.</p>
<p>Just because today ebooks are roughly the same order of magnitude as print sales is no indication we&#8217;ve reached any kind of steady state. (Remember than when ebooks were 0.1% of sales many pundits said -that- was the steady state.) The product adoption &#8220;S-curve&#8221; is the thing to watch. When it starts to really flatten out (i.e. year-over-year ebook sales are flat), -then- we&#8217;ll know we&#8217;ve found equilibrium. However, year-over-year ebook sales are still growing at a huge rate. The growth rate will have to start slowing down a lot before it can plateau, and we don&#8217;t even see it slowing down much yet. That suggests we&#8217;re still in the early-middle to maybe middlish part of the S-curve. The left half the S-curve is more or less a mirror of the right half, so we can surmise that ebooks still have a lot of market share to gain still ahead of them, and will gain it within a few years. Based on the S-curve and my own curve-fitting to it, I would not be surprised to see the end result being that print captures 10% or less of sales.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s worth pointing out that the AAP&#8217;s data for ebook sales vs. print paint a generally similar picture (the AAP reported in June that YTD ebook sales surpassed hardcover sales; and are basically even with paperback sales &#8211; $282M ebook, $230M hardcover, $300M paperback, $99M mmbp; FYI, it&#8217;s their data I base my analyses on), so it&#8217;s not just specific to Amazon, even though Amazon sees the harbingers first. So, right, ebooks have not yet overtaken all print formats, but one train is accelerating rapidly and the other train is slowing down, so if the trends continue (and there&#8217;s no apparent reason they shouldn&#8217;t), ebooks will overtake all print sales fairly soon, and continue pulling ahead.</p>
<p>Some folks may not -like- what the data show the trend is and may wish it otherwise, but from the standpoint of the cold equations, it will be what it will be. Authors would be wise to plan for the (strong) possibility that ebooks will be the primary form of books within a few years.</p>
<p>(And thus, for example, look to get the best deal one can on electronic rights, and examine offers from publishers not in light of today&#8217;s ebook sales figures, but also, e.g., in light of a scenario where ebook sales might be 90%+ of sales.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Spangenberg</title>
		<link>http://www.sfwa.org/2012/08/ebooks-outsell-print-putting-headlines-in-context/#comment-133510</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Spangenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 20:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfwa.org/?guid=39b6bba5f7c4656388c4b3b991f64178#comment-133510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you look at the history of the book, and of publishing, you see the same sorts of predictions for each major change, including the demise of the previous format. You&#039;ll see this regarding the birth of early books, the ones bibliographers classify as incunabula that are half-way between printed codes books, and hand-illuminated mss., (and even in the switch from vellum to paper) and you&#039;ll see it when paperbacks started to become a standard offering in the early 1900s. There were even cries of outrage when Penguin began publishing &quot;classic literature&quot; in affordable cheaply printed but conveniently sized paperbacks. There is, I think, both a generational divide, and a social class divide, in each of these &quot;revolutions&quot; that are really technological modifications of the text container we call a book.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you look at the history of the book, and of publishing, you see the same sorts of predictions for each major change, including the demise of the previous format. You&#8217;ll see this regarding the birth of early books, the ones bibliographers classify as incunabula that are half-way between printed codes books, and hand-illuminated mss., (and even in the switch from vellum to paper) and you&#8217;ll see it when paperbacks started to become a standard offering in the early 1900s. There were even cries of outrage when Penguin began publishing &#8220;classic literature&#8221; in affordable cheaply printed but conveniently sized paperbacks. There is, I think, both a generational divide, and a social class divide, in each of these &#8220;revolutions&#8221; that are really technological modifications of the text container we call a book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
