<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Random House Imprint Hydra Not A Qualifying Market</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sfwa.org/2013/03/random-house-imprint-hydra-not-a-qualifying-market-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sfwa.org/2013/03/random-house-imprint-hydra-not-a-qualifying-market-2/</link>
	<description>Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 20:02:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Random House: Hydra &#124; Bridie Roman</title>
		<link>http://www.sfwa.org/2013/03/random-house-imprint-hydra-not-a-qualifying-market-2/#comment-156707</link>
		<dc:creator>Random House: Hydra &#124; Bridie Roman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 21:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfwa.org/?p=29967#comment-156707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] In a feud that has developed right in front of the online community the SFWA&#8217;s president, John Scalzi, has condemned Random House’s business model for the digital imprints Alibi and Hyrda, saying that the contracts offered to writers are exploitative and deceiving. In response to the contract being offered and to discourage people from giving in to Random Houses demands SFWA has said that those who are published under the Hydra Imprint will not qualify for SFWA membership. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In a feud that has developed right in front of the online community the SFWA&#8217;s president, John Scalzi, has condemned Random House’s business model for the digital imprints Alibi and Hyrda, saying that the contracts offered to writers are exploitative and deceiving. In response to the contract being offered and to discourage people from giving in to Random Houses demands SFWA has said that those who are published under the Hydra Imprint will not qualify for SFWA membership. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Hydra communique - awaiting response from the SFWA</title>
		<link>http://www.sfwa.org/2013/03/random-house-imprint-hydra-not-a-qualifying-market-2/#comment-156706</link>
		<dc:creator>New Hydra communique - awaiting response from the SFWA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 21:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfwa.org/?p=29967#comment-156706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] on strong criticism from writers&#8217; groups, authors, and agents, Random House has decided to make major changes in its digital [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on strong criticism from writers&#8217; groups, authors, and agents, Random House has decided to make major changes in its digital [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Chimney Rabbit : Facing the Hydra</title>
		<link>http://www.sfwa.org/2013/03/random-house-imprint-hydra-not-a-qualifying-market-2/#comment-156574</link>
		<dc:creator>The Chimney Rabbit : Facing the Hydra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 22:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfwa.org/?p=29967#comment-156574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] tore the contract apart on his blog, and the Science Fiction Writers of America have declared that Hydra is not a qualifying market &#8211; basically, that it&#8217;s no different from a vanity publisher or a self-publisher, and if [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tore the contract apart on his blog, and the Science Fiction Writers of America have declared that Hydra is not a qualifying market &#8211; basically, that it&#8217;s no different from a vanity publisher or a self-publisher, and if [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Noble Pen for March 14, 2013 &#171; The Noble Pen</title>
		<link>http://www.sfwa.org/2013/03/random-house-imprint-hydra-not-a-qualifying-market-2/#comment-156557</link>
		<dc:creator>The Noble Pen for March 14, 2013 &#171; The Noble Pen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 17:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfwa.org/?p=29967#comment-156557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] you are unlikely to make any money since they charge an unspecified amount for their services.  SFWA has declared they don&#8217;t count as publishing credits.  Random House has issued a reply that hasn&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you are unlikely to make any money since they charge an unspecified amount for their services.  SFWA has declared they don&#8217;t count as publishing credits.  Random House has issued a reply that hasn&#8217;t [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Random House accused of &#8216;predatory&#8217; contracts for new ebook imprint - British News Cloud</title>
		<link>http://www.sfwa.org/2013/03/random-house-imprint-hydra-not-a-qualifying-market-2/#comment-156552</link>
		<dc:creator>Random House accused of &#8216;predatory&#8217; contracts for new ebook imprint - British News Cloud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 16:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfwa.org/?p=29967#comment-156552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] comes after the association removed the digital-only SF imprint from the list of publishers whose authors qualify for SFWA membe..., and the SFWA president John Scalzi called the terms Hydra appeared to be offering authors [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] comes after the association removed the digital-only SF imprint from the list of publishers whose authors qualify for SFWA membe&#8230;, and the SFWA president John Scalzi called the terms Hydra appeared to be offering authors [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanja Cilia</title>
		<link>http://www.sfwa.org/2013/03/random-house-imprint-hydra-not-a-qualifying-market-2/#comment-156546</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanja Cilia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 13:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfwa.org/?p=29967#comment-156546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There have been misunderstandings!:http://www.hydrapublications.com/2013/03/06/we-are-not-random-house/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There have been misunderstandings!:<a href="http://www.hydrapublications.com/2013/03/06/we-are-not-random-house/" rel="nofollow">http://www.hydrapublications.com/2013/03/06/we-are-not-random-house/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
