Koi Wonder
The Koi Wonder
  WRITER BEWARE

Warnings About Literary Fraud and Other Schemes, Scams, and Pitfalls That Target Writers

Alerts for Writers
Case
Studies
Contests and Anthologies Copyright Electronic publishing Literary Agents Print on Demand Vanity Publishers Writers' Services

Definitions

An independent editor, sometimes called a book doctor, is someone who, for a fee, will undertake to read and edit your manuscript for structure, style, plot, character development, continuity, and so on.

What's the difference between anindependent editor and an editor employed by a publishing house?
  • An in-house editor works with authors on a publisher's behalf, editing books prior to publication. She edits to her own taste but also to the publisher's standards. Any book acquired by a legitimate publisher will be edited in-house. This editing is part of the publication process, and the author isn't charged for it.
  • An independent editor is an independent contractor working directly for, and paid by, the author. What kind of editing is done, and how extensive, is entirely up to the author.
Most independent editors offer a number of different levels of editing, from which you can pick and choose. These may include:
  • Manuscript evaluation or critique. A broad overall assessment of your full ms., pinpointing strengths and weaknesses. Specific problem areas may be flagged, and general suggestions for improvement made, but a critique won't usually provide line-by-line advice on revision.
  • Content editing (also known as developmental or substantive editing). Focuses on structure, style, and content. The editor reads the ms. to flag specific problems--structural difficulties, poor pacing, plot or conceptual inconsistencies, stiff dialogue, poorly-developed characters, stylistic troubles, flabby writing. The editor him/herself may rewrite the ms. to fix these problems, or may provide notations and detailed advice so the author can address them.
  • Line editing. Editing at the sentence level, focusing on paragraph and sentence structure, word use, dialogue rhythms, etc., with the aim of creating a smooth prose flow.
  • Copy editing. Correction of common errors (grammar, spelling, punctuation), incorrect usages, logic lapses, continuity problems.
  • Proofreading. Checking for typos, spelling/punctuation errors, formatting mistakes, and other minor mechanical problems.
Editing terminology is fluid. Some editors define the above terms differently, or use different terms. Others simply provide "light", "medium", and "heavy" editing--light being on the order of copy editing, medium and heavy being some combination of line and content editing. It's important, before hiring an editor, that you're clear on exactly what services s/he provides.

When Do You Need an Independent Editor?

Hiring an independent editor can be an expensive proposition. A thorough content edit from an experienced, credentialed editor can cost several thousand dollars, pounds, or euros. A basic copy edit may cost several hundred.

Do you really need to spend that kind of money? Before you decide, it makes sense to investigate alternatives--a sympathetic friend who's not afraid to criticize, a local writers' group or critique circle, an online writers' group, a creative writing course, an English professor at a local college, a professional writer with whom you're acquainted. Any of these may be able to give you the help you need, free of charge or at a fraction of the cost.

Still, there are circumstances in which hiring an independent editor may make sense:
  • If the alternatives aren't easily available--or if you've used them, and still don't feel you're getting the feedback you need.
  • If you've begun submitting your polished ms. and are getting positive comments, but still are racking up rejections. Something's wrong, and you aren't quite sure what--or the rejections all seem to identify the same problems. Again, a good independent editor may be able to help.
  • If you've written or want to write a nonfiction book on a subject in which you're an expert, but you aren't a professional writer. If your idea is marketable, an independent editor may be a good investment.
  • If you've chosen self- or vanity publishing, or one of the non-fee-charging print-on-demand-based publishers with an open acceptance policy. Publishers like these may copy edit, but they don't do substantive editing--so if you want the benefit of that final professional scrutiny, you'll need to find someone to provide it.
Whatever your situation, hiring an independent editor shouldn't be like taking your car to a mechanic--you go away for two hours and when you come back your car is fixed. You'll get the most out of your experience if you treat it as a learning opportunity--a chance to hone and improve your own editing skills. Self-editing is an essential part of the writer's craft. If you're really serious about a writing career, it's something you need to master.

What Editing Can't Buy

When considering an independent editor, keep your expectations realistic. There are things even the best editor can't do for you.
  • Provide a magic fix. Editing is a subjective process. There's no set "formula" for dynamic plots or well-rounded characters or even good prose style (beware of any independent editor who tells you there is). And even the most accomplished editor can't make a bad manuscript into a good one. As one in-house editor commented at a writing conference I attended some time ago: edited slush is slightly better slush, but it's still slush.
  • Turn a good book into a potential bestseller. Again, there are no formulas for this. Bestsellers come in all shapes and sizes, and even publishers are sometimes surprised when bestsellerdom occurs (and when it doesn't). Only a dishonest editor will make such a promise.
  • Ensure publication. Good editing may improve your manuscript, but finding publication depends on more than just the quality of your work. Effective targeting of your submissions, editors' judgment of readers' tastes, the perceived marketability of your book, and what the publisher is already publishing all play a part. An excellent, polished manuscript is essential, but it's just one piece of the total picture. There are no guarantees.
  • Make literary agents and in-house editors more likely to look at your work. Agents and in-house editors know the limitations of editing. They're also well aware of how many underqualified and unscrupulous independent editors there are. Typing "professionally edited" on the title page of your manuscript, or mentioning it in a cover letter, will not improve your chances. In fact, it may harm them--there are so many unqualified editors that agents and in-house editors may assume you've been duped.


What to Watch Out For

There are plenty of expert independent editors. However, there are also many who set up shop with little experience and few qualifications.

These individuals may be entirely well-meaning, sincerely believing that a love of reading, or a career as a teacher, or some technical writing experience, is enough to qualify them to edit others' work. But such people rarely possess the specialized skills, not to mention the industry knowledge, that are essential for a professional-quality line or content edit. Often they provide services that are little more than glorified copy editing or proofreading--i.e., things you could probably do yourself.

Still other independent editors and editing services are outright frauds--Edit Ink, for instance, an editing firm that engaged in a kickback scheme with agents and publishers and employed underqualified staff to perform rudimentary, overpriced edits (for an in-depth look at Edit Ink, see the Case Studies page).

How to avoid editors like this? A few common-sense guidelines:
  • Request a resume or CV. You're looking for professional editing experience (preferably with a commercial publisher) and/or professional writing credentials (legitimately-published books, articles, etc.). If the editor has a website, her CV should be posted there. An editing service should post staff names and biographies. Be extremely cautious of editors whose websites say nothing about their credentials, and of editing services that don't identify their staff.

    For individual editors, membership in the Editorial Freelancers Association (US), the Society of Freelance Editors and Proofreaders (UK), the Institute of Professional Editors (Australia), or the Editors' Association of Canada are all indications of professionalism.
  • Ask for titles of some of the books on which the editor has worked. Commercially published books indicate professional experience and standing, though some good independent editors specialize in self- or POD-published authors (if that's the case, try to get hold of one or more of the books so you can assess quality). Again, if the editor has a website, the information should be available there.
  • Be sure the editor's experience is appropriate to your work. Good editors specialize. Someone whose main experience involves nonfiction may not be the ideal choice to edit your epic fantasy novel.
  • Verify that the editor really is independent, especially if you've been referred to him/her. No third party (such as a literary agent) should benefit from your use of the editor's services.
  • Get references, and check them. This is important. Other than a recommendation from someone you trust, it's probably your best way to judge an editor's professionalism and effectiveness.
  • Ask to see a sample of a critique the editor has written. This will give you an idea of what you'll be getting for your money.
  • Before making a final commitment, speak or correspond with the editor. You want to be sure the editor understands your needs, and that you understand what the editor will do for you. You also need to feel comfortable with the editor--not just professionally, but personally--and she with you.
  • Make sure the business arrangements are clear. You should know exactly what you'll be paying for, including the scope of the work to be done, the charges you'll incur, the approximate time period involved, and who will be doing the editing (you don't want to choose an editor because of his reputation and discover you've been passed on to a less-qualified underling). Ideally, obtain a contract or a letter of agreement that covers all these areas.
And if you encounter any of the following, be wary:
  • A referral from a literary agent or publisher. A reputable agent may tell you that your book needs work, and suggest that you think about hiring an independent editor. She may even give you some names to choose from. Be on your guard, though, if you're urged to use a specific editor or editing service. In such cases a kickback arrangement may be involved, a la Edit Ink, or the agent or publisher may own the editing service itself (perhaps under a different name). Either way, it's a conflict of interest--how can a writer trust a referral that makes a profit for the referrer?
  • Recommendation of a publisher's or agent's own paid editing services. Another conflict of interest. If the agent or publisher can profit from a recommendation to edit, how can you be sure that the recommendation is in your best interest?
  • Extravagant praise or promises. No reputable independent editor will tell you that your book has huge commercial potential or that it's likely to become a bestseller. Nor will she claim that an edit will make agency representation more likely, or improve your chances of selling to a major publisher. Why? Because these are promises that can't be guaranteed, and a good editor, like a good agent, knows better than to make them.
  • Statements that publishers nowadays won't look at mss. that haven't been professionally edited. Dishonest or ignorant editors often prey on the anxieties of aspiring writers by saying that publishers won't look at manuscripts unless they've been professionally edited. In-house editors, they say, no longer have the time to edit--they want books that are picture-perfect and ready to publish.

    This isn't so. It's true that in today's world of big publishing conglomerates, where in-house editors must handle enormous workloads and do double duty as administrators, the days when an editor could afford to invest months working with an author to shape a promising but not-quite-ready manuscript are largely gone. But it's false to say that in-house editors don't edit (they do), or that professional editing is a prerequisite for publication (it isn't), or even that the name of an editing service on a manuscript will make a publisher more likely to read it (it won't. See above). Your manuscript needs to be as perfect as you can make it--finished, polished, and properly presented. But no one will hold it against you if you accomplish this yourself.
  • One-size-fits-all editing, all comers accepted. Most good independent editors have areas of specialization that reflect their experience. The skills required to edit a romance novel, for instance, are quite different from those needed for a work of narrative nonfiction. That's not to say a single editor won't possess both skill sets--but it's unlikely that one person will be able to edit any and all subjects and genres with equal effectiveness. Also, within the basic scope of services he provides, a good editor will tailor each editing job to the client. Standardized editing services and a lack of specialization suggest an amateur or inexperienced editor.
  • Anonymous editing. Some editing services don't post staff resumes on their websites, and don't tell you in advance who will be assigned to you. You thus have no way of verifying your editor's credentials, or of ensuring that he or she has experience appropriate to your work. Sometimes the services will provide this information if you request it. Be wary of those that won't.
  • Direct solicitation. Independent editors may maintain websites or advertise in industry journals. But they don't cold-call writers. If you've registered your copyright or subscribe to a writer's magazine, you may be a target: disreputable editors sometimes purchase mailing lists from these sources.
  • An offer of a special deal and/or pressure to accept services. One way disreputable editors attempt to hook clients is by promising a special fee reduction or a limited time offer. Reputable editors don't operate this way, nor will they try to pressure a writer into a decision.
  • Refusal of reasonable requests for information. Like a reputable agent, a reputable independent editor should have no problem providing a resume, references, and samples of her work. Be wary if you encounter resistance in any of these areas.
  • Vagueness about specific services. An editor should be willing to say exactly what he will do for you. If an editor won't give you a firm price, or doesn't want to specify what his fees will cover, or won't tell you exactly who will be working on your manuscript, move on.

Links

Information on Independent Editors

  • The Book Doctor is In! An article by John Baker of Publishers Weekly that discusses how reputable independent editors work.
  • This article on the role of the independent editor has a bias: it's written by an independent editor and therefore presents hiring one in the most positive possible light. However, there's good information here on what to look for in a qualified editor.
  • This interview with experienced independent editor Lisa Rojany-Buccieri offers an overview of what good editors can--and can't--do for writers.
  • A Professional Critique: What Should You Receive for Your Money? This article from author Margot Finke discusses how to choose someone to critique your work, and what to expect from a good critique. Oriented to children's writers, but useful for anyone.
  • About editors, from author Tara K. Harper.
  • The Society for Editors and Proofreaders is a professional editors' organization of editors in the UK. Its website includes a Code of Practice, and a chart of recommended minimum rates.
  • The Editorial Freelancers Association is a similar organization in the USA. Its website includes a Code Of Fair Practice defining ethical standards for freelancers and their clients, as well as an excellent job board where requests for editors can be posted. There's also this helpful chart of common rates for editorial services.
  • The Editors' Association of Canada, another national professional organization, provides training and certification for editors. Its website hosts a discussion of professional editing standards, and a downloadable standard freelance editorial agreement.
  • The Institute of Professional Editors (formerly the Council of Australian Societies of Editors) is the professional editors' association in Australia. Its website includes the Australian Standards for Editing Practice, which identify and define the knowledge and skills expected of experienced Australian editors. The Institute is currently developing an accreditation program for Australian editors.
  • The Bay Area Editors' Forum is a regional association of in-house and independent editors; its website contains rate surveys, helpful discussions of the editing and publishing process, and a list of members.
  • The Consulting Editors' Alliance is a private group of experienced independent editors in the USA (the CEA is one of the groups mentioned in John Baker's article, above).
  • Ditto for the Independent Editors' Group (another of the groups mentioned in John Baker's article).
  • >A fraudulent editing service: Edit Ink.
  • I usually hear from writers who've been scammed by freelance editors. But here's a story about a freelance editor who was scammed by a writer: Street Smart But Not Scam Proof, by Marie Stone.

Alternatives to Independent Editing


Except for graphics, and where specifically indicated, all Writer Beware contents copyright © 1998-2008 Victoria Strauss

Top of page

Home